<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>unixzone dot dk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unixzone.dk/unix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix</link>
	<description>another day, another blog..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:11:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Replacing Cisco PIX battery</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/replacing-cisco-pix-battery/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/replacing-cisco-pix-battery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[515e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Today, while debugging a new 10/10Mbit broadband connection my trusty old Cisco PIX 515E decided it&#8217;d had enough or rather the lithium battery did. Bit of Googling didn&#8217;t yield any results on replacing it but I remembered that last time I had it open the battery did look quite plain, so I took it apart [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Button Cell battery" src="http://www.battericenter.dk/img/p/49-238-medium.jpg" alt="" width="80" height="80" /></p>
<p>Today, while debugging a new 10/10Mbit broadband connection my trusty old Cisco PIX 515E decided it&#8217;d had enough or rather the lithium battery did. Bit of Googling didn&#8217;t yield any results on replacing it but I remembered that last time I had it open the battery did look quite plain, so I took it apart and found what appeared to be a standard &#8220;button cell&#8221; battery codenamed BR2032 3V. After scrambling around a bit in a drawer I found a CR2025 which is a bit thinner, .5mm to be exact, but it should fit just fine, the specs are the exact same except for the height but that&#8217;s not an issue as .5mm really isn&#8217;t much and it&#8217;s a real squeeze to fit it in the socket.. Guess what, it works beautifully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/replacing-cisco-pix-battery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>XenServer &#8220;Midnight Ride&#8221; Beta</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/xenserver-midnight-ride-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/xenserver-midnight-ride-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xenserver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The good folks at Citrix have is working on a new release of XenServer codenamed &#8220;Midnight Ride&#8221;, and a public beta is supposed to surface in March 2010.
Some of the new features are, but not limited to:


Granular Role-based access controls within XenCenter
Dynamic Memory Control &#38; Overcommit
Enhanced snapshots, including full system state and  one-click  revert
Administrative [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good folks at Citrix have is working on a new release of XenServer codenamed &#8220;Midnight Ride&#8221;, and a public beta is supposed to surface in March 2010.</p>
<p>Some of the new features are, but not limited to:</p>
<ul>
<div>
<li>Granular Role-based access controls within XenCenter</li>
<li>Dynamic Memory Control &amp; Overcommit</li>
<li>Enhanced snapshots, including full system state and  one-click  revert</li>
<li>Administrative logging and audit reports</li>
<li>Automation for Workload Balancing</li>
<li>Host Power Management</li>
<li>StorageLink Site Recovery for business continuity</li>
<li>Enhanced CPU comptibility for XenMotion</li>
<li>Streamlined XenCenter interface</li>
<li>Support for “Supplementary Packs” for hardware vendor-specific  features (i.e. Dell, HP)</li>
</div>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;m particularly excited about memory overcommit, can&#8217;t wait to see how this will perform on a real live system.</p>
<p>For more information and a Webinar signup link, have a look at <a href="http://www.citrix.com/English/ps2/products/subfeature.asp?contentID=1861678">http://www.citrix.com/English/ps2/products/subfeature.asp?contentID=1861678</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/xenserver-midnight-ride-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No more free Sun patches</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/no-more-free-sun-patches/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/no-more-free-sun-patches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oracle has done it, without a paid support contract you cannot get ANY Sun patches, not even critical security patches. http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-61-203648-1.
I don&#8217;t believe this is the correct way to do business, sure they stand to make a bit more money but in the grand scheme of things I can&#8217;t see it making much of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oracle has done it, without a paid support contract you cannot get ANY Sun patches, not even critical security patches. <a href="http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-61-203648-1">http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-61-203648-1</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe this is the correct way to do business, sure they stand to make a bit more money but in the grand scheme of things I can&#8217;t see it making much of a difference, only thing that will happen is that a lot of current customers will get pissed off with the new policy, and new potential customers will go a non-Sun/Oracle route ie. Linux or Windows (MS still supply free security patches).</p>
<p>Here is an <a href="http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=123709&#038;tstart=0">OpenSolaris thread</a> on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/no-more-free-sun-patches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EMC inq utility</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/emc-inq-utility/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/emc-inq-utility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scsi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The EMC inq utility is a sought after little gem, a simple google search will quickly show you where to find it, yet a lot of people seem to struggle.
All versions ranging from 4.0.1 (2001) up to and including the latest 7.1.0.0 (Dec 2009) are available at ftp://ftp.emc.com/pub/symm3000/inquiry/ for free, there are various Linux versions, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The EMC inq utility is a sought after little gem, a simple google search will quickly show you where to find it, yet a lot of people seem to struggle.</p>
<p>All versions ranging from 4.0.1 (2001) up to and including the latest 7.1.0.0 (Dec 2009) are available at <a href="ftp://ftp.emc.com/pub/symm3000/inquiry/">ftp://ftp.emc.com/pub/symm3000/inquiry/</a> for free, there are various Linux versions, Solaris, HPUX, AIX and Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/emc-inq-utility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Tribute to Sun Microsystems</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/a-tribute-to-sun-microsystems/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/a-tribute-to-sun-microsystems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun microsystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the network is the computer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For more than 27 years, Sun has led the way in network computing innovation. And while oftentimes taking the road less traveled, our journey has delivered some of the most revolutionary — and evolutionary — ideas, business practices, and products. From Solaris to Java, open standards to open source, high-performance computing to eco computing, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>For more than 27 years, Sun has led the way in network computing innovation. And while oftentimes taking the road less traveled, our journey has delivered some of the most revolutionary — and evolutionary — ideas, business practices, and products. From Solaris to Java, open standards to open source, high-performance computing to eco computing, and everything in between, we&#8217;ve created a vibrant culture and a rich history, both of which we&#8217;ve shared with our partners, developers, students, universities, and of course, our customers.</p>
<p>We asked Sun employees from around the world to share some of their favorite anecdotes about their experiences at Sun. Take a look back at some of our more memorable moments and celebrate the unique culture that is Sun. </p></blockquote>
<p>This is a great site with lots of history about Sun Microsystems, how Sun made a difference to it&#8217;s employees and the world, it&#8217;s innovations throughout the years, jokes, pranks, t-shirts and all the things that made Sun special, go check it out!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thenetworkisthecomputer.com/">http://www.thenetworkisthecomputer.com/</a><br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/a-tribute-to-sun-microsystems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compiling Apache HTTP server on OpenSolaris</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/compiling-apache-http-server-on-opensolaris/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/compiling-apache-http-server-on-opensolaris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[configure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[httpd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This may not come as a surprise to many of you, especially the ones who have used OpenSolaris for a long time, but for myself who have only recently started tampering with the Indiana branch of OpenSolaris it took a few minutes to figure out what was going on.
When running Apache&#8217;s configure on OpenSolaris build [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may not come as a surprise to many of you, especially the ones who have used OpenSolaris for a long time, but for myself who have only recently started tampering with the Indiana branch of OpenSolaris it took a few minutes to figure out what was going on.</p>
<p>When running Apache&#8217;s configure on OpenSolaris build 131 it would bomb out at:</p>
<p><code>Configuring Apache Portable Runtime Utility library...<br />
checking for APR-util... yes<br />
  adding "-L/usr/lib" to LDFLAGS<br />
checking for gcc... gcc<br />
checking for C compiler default output file name...<br />
configure: error: in `/root/httpd-2.2.13':</code></p>
<p>Checking config.log showed me that it failed at <code>cc1: error: invalid option 't'</code>   Odd!<br />
It didn&#8217;t immediately occur to me that it was using the OpenSolaris supplied APR-util which is using the SunPro compiler.</p>
<p>So, the solution is to run configure with the <code>--with-included-apr</code> option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/compiling-apache-http-server-on-opensolaris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preliminary Text Install Images for b131</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/preliminary-text-install-images-for-b131/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/preliminary-text-install-images-for-b131/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caiman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[install]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sxce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday the OpenSolaris Install team released their first preliminary version of OpenSolaris which is capable of installing without a GUI, meaning entirely text based, this is great news and in due time now that SXCE is being pulled. It should now be much easier to install SPARC and xVM DomU&#8217;s, and what&#8217;s equally exciting is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday the OpenSolaris Install team released their first preliminary version of OpenSolaris which is capable of installing without a GUI, meaning entirely text based, this is great news and in due time now that SXCE is being pulled. It should now be much easier to install SPARC and xVM DomU&#8217;s, and what&#8217;s equally exciting is that it doesn&#8217;t install GNOME, this is ideal for servers where you don&#8217;t want all that GUI clutter.</p>
<blockquote><p>The install team has been working on a text-based installer for OpenSolaris.<br />
While this installer is not quite complete, given the timing of the SXCE to<br />
OpenSolaris transition, we are making available a preliminary version of the<br />
text installer, based on OpenSolaris build 131:</p>
<p>o supports SPARC/x86<br />
o 512 MB minimum memory requirement<br />
o cpio based install<br />
o installs basic headless server environment (no Gnome Desktop)<br />
o tip/serial line install recommended for SPARC</p>
<p>These are pre-integration bits from the project gate. Updates will be provided<br />
with each successive build of OpenSolaris until such time as a formal delivery<br />
is complete (after 2010.03) and RE assumes the building and distribution of images.</p>
<p>The CD images are located at:<br />
 SPARC:<br />
<a href="http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/text_install/131/textinstall-131-sparc.iso">http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/text_install/131/textinstall-131-sparc.iso</a><br />
   Size: 674 MB</p>
<p> x86:<br />
<a href="http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/text_install/131/textinstall-131-x86.iso">http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/text_install/131/textinstall-131-x86.iso</a><br />
   Size: 680 MB<br />
<a href="http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/text_install/131/textinstall-131-x86.usb">http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/text_install/131/textinstall-131-x86.usb</a><br />
   Size: 816 MB</p>
<p>MD5 sums are located at:<br />
  <a href="http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/text_install/131/md5sum.txt">http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/text_install/131/md5sum.txt</a></p>
<p>Please read the release notes page at:<br />
   <a href="http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+caiman/Text+Install+b131+Notes">http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+caiman/Text+Install+b131+Notes</a><br />
for known limitations, a FAQ, and a link to open bugs.</p>
<p>Bugs can be filed on bugzilla at http://defect.opensolaris.org<br />
 Classification: Development<br />
 Product:        installer<br />
 Component:      textui</p>
<p>For more information on the text installer, see:</p>
<p>http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+caiman/TextInstallerProject</p>
<p>Please refer any questions to: caiman-discuss@opensolaris.org</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Sue</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/preliminary-text-install-images-for-b131/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick HOWTO: Sun DHCP daemon</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/quick-howto-sun-dhcp-daemon/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/quick-howto-sun-dhcp-daemon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhcp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhcpd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in.dhcpd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sun&#8217;s own DHCP daemon is not often used for anything besides Jumpstart/PXE boot and SunRay&#8217;s presumably because it&#8217;s not as well documented and accepted as the ISC DHCP daemon. I recently had a need to quickly setup a DHCP server and serve out a range of IP adresses including DNS servers and a default router, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sun&#8217;s own DHCP daemon is not often used for anything besides Jumpstart/PXE boot and SunRay&#8217;s presumably because it&#8217;s not as well documented and accepted as the <a href="http://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/">ISC DHCP</a> daemon. I recently had a need to quickly setup a DHCP server and serve out a range of IP adresses including DNS servers and a default router, all in all very basic. Here are my notes.</p>
<p>Setup DHCP in /var/dhcp using the SUNWfiles format<br />
<code># dhcpconfig -D -r SUNWfiles -p /var/dhcp</code></p>
<p>We only want to serve DHCP requests on bge1<br />
<code># /usr/sbin/dhcpconfig -P INTERFACES=bge1</code></p>
<p>Add new network<br />
<code># dhcpconfig -N 172.22.2.0 -m 255.255.255.0 -t 172.22.2.1</code></p>
<p>Display dhcptab table<br />
<code># dhtadm -P</code></p>
<p>Modify network/macro with various options<br />
<code># dhtadm -M -m 172.22.2.0 -d ':Subnet=255.255.255.0:Router=172.22.2.1:Broadcst=172.22.2.255:DNSserv=8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4:LeaseTim=86400:' -g</code></p>
<p>Add one client IP<br />
<code># pntadm -A 172.22.2.101 -c dhcp101 -m 172.22.2.0 172.22.2.0</code></p>
<p>Adding several client IPs<br />
<code># for IP in 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110<br />
do<br />
pntadm -A 172.22.2.${IP} -c dhcp${IP} -m 172.22.2.0 172.22.2.0<br />
done</code></p>
<p>Delete client IP<br />
<code># pntadm -D 172.22.2.107 172.22.2.0</code></p>
<p>Display DHCP network table<br />
<code># pntadm -P 172.22.2.0</code></p>
<p>Documentation: <a href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-3000/dhcptm-1?l=en&#038;a=view">Solaris System Administration Guide: IP Services &gt; DHCP</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/quick-howto-sun-dhcp-daemon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nevada: What&#8217;s going, what&#8217;s staying, what&#8217;s changing, what&#8217;s not</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/nevada-whats-going-whats-staying-whats-changing-whats-not/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/nevada-whats-going-whats-staying-whats-changing-whats-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jumpstart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sxce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allan Coopersmitch has posted a short explanation of what is going on now that SXCE (Solaris Express Community Edition) will no longer be available past january 2010.
There&#8217;s been some confusion over the upcoming changes as SXCE ends while
Nevada builds continue to be published to the IPS package repositories,
so this is an attempt to clear up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allan Coopersmitch has posted a short explanation of what is going on now that SXCE (Solaris Express Community Edition) will no longer be available past january 2010.</p>
<blockquote><p>There&#8217;s been some confusion over the upcoming changes as SXCE ends while<br />
Nevada builds continue to be published to the IPS package repositories,<br />
so this is an attempt to clear up some of that.   (Just in case it&#8217;s unclear,<br />
I am writing this is as an engineer trying to explain our work &#8211; I am not any<br />
sort of official spokesman, nor am I announcing any policy changes.)</p>
<p>What&#8217;s changing at build 131:</p>
<p>- The OS install images will only be available in IPS packaged formats.<br />
This means installs will be done via LiveCD (x86) or Automated<br />
Installer (SPARC or x86) &#8211; the old Install DVD, network install,<br />
jumpstart, and live upgrade all rely on the SXCE/SVR4 packaged<br />
images,    which will not be available after build 130.</p>
<p>Most consolidations provide the same packages via both mechanisms,<br />
though the IPS versions have some changes, such as merging the<br />
split / (root) and /usr filesystem packages into one combined package.</p>
<p>A number of packages that were already scheduled for removal from the<br />
next release of Solaris, or which are not redistributable due to third<br />
party license encumbrances, are not included in the IPS repositories.</p>
<p>For instance, for X, we&#8217;ve not packaged Xsun or the legacy SPARC graphics<br />
drivers in IPS format, so once this changeover is done, SPARC<br />
platforms will only have Xorg, and only have the graphics drivers for<br />
astfb (AST2000, 2100), efb (XVR-50, 100, 300), and kfb (XVR-2500).</p>
<p>CDE has similarly only had IPS conversions done of the packages for<br />
the non-EOF portions (Motif, Tooltalk, dtksh, etc.) and most of the<br />
CDE desktop applications &amp; environment will go away in the transition.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s not changing at build 131:</p>
<p>- Build schedules &#8211; still every two weeks (except at holidays), still<br />
following the same Nevada build schedule and build sequence &#8211; the<br />
builds continue to be numbered &#8220;snv_131&#8243;, &#8220;snv_132&#8243;, etc.</p>
<p>See http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+on/schedule<br />
for the ongoing schedules for when the code freezes occur and the<br />
packages are delivered to the release engineers who build the ISO<br />
images and IPS repositories.   As before, these are *build* schedules,<br />
not release schedules, and release of the built product remains about<br />
two weeks behind the build date shown.</p>
<p>- Bug tracking &#8211; the release is still &#8220;solaris_nevada&#8221;, and the builds<br />
have the same names as before.   Developers won&#8217;t start ignoring<br />
all &#8220;nevada&#8221; bugs, but once the changeover happens bugs that only<br />
affect the SVR4 install methods (live upgrade, pkghistory, postinstall<br />
scripts, etc.) may be either marked with the &#8220;no-snv+&#8221; keyword<br />
to indicate they are not Nevada bugs if they affect prior releases<br />
of Solaris, or closed as will-not-fix if they only applied to the<br />
Nevada versions.</p>
<p>Bugs for most of the OS should still be filed into Sun&#8217;s bugster<br />
database via the http://bugs.opensolaris.org/ website, though<br />
IPS, OpenSolaris Installation, and Desktop bugs should continue to<br />
be filed in the bugzilla database at http://defect.opensolaris.org/</p>
<p>- Code repositories &#8211; the Nevada gates/repositories for all the<br />
consolidations will still be used &#8211; onnv for ON, XW_NV for X,<br />
sfwnv for SFW, etc.</p>
<p>- The packages created by building the code &#8211; for the next few builds,<br />
all consolidations will continue to generate SVR4 packages for their<br />
builds, and the IPS team will continue to convert them to IPS, just<br />
as they have been since the IPS builds started for the first<br />
OpenSolaris release.</p>
<p>ON will be changing generate IPS packages first, after the 2010.03<br />
release of OpenSolaris, as noted in:</p>
<p>http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/on-discuss/2010-January/001461.html</p>
<p>The rest of the consolidations will change in later builds, once<br />
we see what issues ON hits, and the necessary infrastructure is<br />
in place for delivering IPS packages from consolidations to the<br />
central Release Engineering repository.  X, Desktop, &amp; SFW are next<br />
in line after ON, and have been working with Liane &amp; the ON/IPS team<br />
on planning for our changeovers.</p>
<p>I hope this helps with confusion people have had &#8211; if not, try asking<br />
your questions on the appropriate OpenSolaris.Org mailing list or web<br />
forum.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/nevada-whats-going-whats-staying-whats-changing-whats-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The death of NIS+</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/the-death-of-nis/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/the-death-of-nis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nis plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nis+]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of OpenSolaris build 130 NIS+ is officially no longer available, refer http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6874309
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of OpenSolaris build 130 NIS+ is officially no longer available, refer <a href="http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6874309">http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6874309</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/the-death-of-nis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
