<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>unixzone dot dk &#187; jumpstart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unixzone.dk/unix/tag/jumpstart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix</link>
	<description>another day, another blog..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nevada: What&#8217;s going, what&#8217;s staying, what&#8217;s changing, what&#8217;s not</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/nevada-whats-going-whats-staying-whats-changing-whats-not/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/nevada-whats-going-whats-staying-whats-changing-whats-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jumpstart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sxce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allan Coopersmitch has posted a short explanation of what is going on now that SXCE (Solaris Express Community Edition) will no longer be available past january 2010.
There&#8217;s been some confusion over the upcoming changes as SXCE ends while
Nevada builds continue to be published to the IPS package repositories,
so this is an attempt to clear up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allan Coopersmitch has posted a short explanation of what is going on now that SXCE (Solaris Express Community Edition) will no longer be available past january 2010.</p>
<blockquote><p>There&#8217;s been some confusion over the upcoming changes as SXCE ends while<br />
Nevada builds continue to be published to the IPS package repositories,<br />
so this is an attempt to clear up some of that.   (Just in case it&#8217;s unclear,<br />
I am writing this is as an engineer trying to explain our work &#8211; I am not any<br />
sort of official spokesman, nor am I announcing any policy changes.)</p>
<p>What&#8217;s changing at build 131:</p>
<p>- The OS install images will only be available in IPS packaged formats.<br />
This means installs will be done via LiveCD (x86) or Automated<br />
Installer (SPARC or x86) &#8211; the old Install DVD, network install,<br />
jumpstart, and live upgrade all rely on the SXCE/SVR4 packaged<br />
images,    which will not be available after build 130.</p>
<p>Most consolidations provide the same packages via both mechanisms,<br />
though the IPS versions have some changes, such as merging the<br />
split / (root) and /usr filesystem packages into one combined package.</p>
<p>A number of packages that were already scheduled for removal from the<br />
next release of Solaris, or which are not redistributable due to third<br />
party license encumbrances, are not included in the IPS repositories.</p>
<p>For instance, for X, we&#8217;ve not packaged Xsun or the legacy SPARC graphics<br />
drivers in IPS format, so once this changeover is done, SPARC<br />
platforms will only have Xorg, and only have the graphics drivers for<br />
astfb (AST2000, 2100), efb (XVR-50, 100, 300), and kfb (XVR-2500).</p>
<p>CDE has similarly only had IPS conversions done of the packages for<br />
the non-EOF portions (Motif, Tooltalk, dtksh, etc.) and most of the<br />
CDE desktop applications &amp; environment will go away in the transition.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s not changing at build 131:</p>
<p>- Build schedules &#8211; still every two weeks (except at holidays), still<br />
following the same Nevada build schedule and build sequence &#8211; the<br />
builds continue to be numbered &#8220;snv_131&#8243;, &#8220;snv_132&#8243;, etc.</p>
<p>See http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+on/schedule<br />
for the ongoing schedules for when the code freezes occur and the<br />
packages are delivered to the release engineers who build the ISO<br />
images and IPS repositories.   As before, these are *build* schedules,<br />
not release schedules, and release of the built product remains about<br />
two weeks behind the build date shown.</p>
<p>- Bug tracking &#8211; the release is still &#8220;solaris_nevada&#8221;, and the builds<br />
have the same names as before.   Developers won&#8217;t start ignoring<br />
all &#8220;nevada&#8221; bugs, but once the changeover happens bugs that only<br />
affect the SVR4 install methods (live upgrade, pkghistory, postinstall<br />
scripts, etc.) may be either marked with the &#8220;no-snv+&#8221; keyword<br />
to indicate they are not Nevada bugs if they affect prior releases<br />
of Solaris, or closed as will-not-fix if they only applied to the<br />
Nevada versions.</p>
<p>Bugs for most of the OS should still be filed into Sun&#8217;s bugster<br />
database via the http://bugs.opensolaris.org/ website, though<br />
IPS, OpenSolaris Installation, and Desktop bugs should continue to<br />
be filed in the bugzilla database at http://defect.opensolaris.org/</p>
<p>- Code repositories &#8211; the Nevada gates/repositories for all the<br />
consolidations will still be used &#8211; onnv for ON, XW_NV for X,<br />
sfwnv for SFW, etc.</p>
<p>- The packages created by building the code &#8211; for the next few builds,<br />
all consolidations will continue to generate SVR4 packages for their<br />
builds, and the IPS team will continue to convert them to IPS, just<br />
as they have been since the IPS builds started for the first<br />
OpenSolaris release.</p>
<p>ON will be changing generate IPS packages first, after the 2010.03<br />
release of OpenSolaris, as noted in:</p>
<p>http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/on-discuss/2010-January/001461.html</p>
<p>The rest of the consolidations will change in later builds, once<br />
we see what issues ON hits, and the necessary infrastructure is<br />
in place for delivering IPS packages from consolidations to the<br />
central Release Engineering repository.  X, Desktop, &amp; SFW are next<br />
in line after ON, and have been working with Liane &amp; the ON/IPS team<br />
on planning for our changeovers.</p>
<p>I hope this helps with confusion people have had &#8211; if not, try asking<br />
your questions on the appropriate OpenSolaris.Org mailing list or web<br />
forum.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/nevada-whats-going-whats-staying-whats-changing-whats-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
