<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>unixzone dot dk &#187; OpenSolaris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unixzone.dk/unix/tag/opensolaris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix</link>
	<description>another day, another blog..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>OpenSolaris IPS</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/03/opensolaris-ips/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/03/opensolaris-ips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pkg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#60;rant&#62;
Why is IPS so slow?  I&#8217;m trying to do image-update a fresh install of b131 to b134 which is about 784MB in 90054 files, I get between 20 and 100Kb/sec, so far it&#8217;s taken two hours to download 661MB and it&#8217;s not my bandwidth as I always get 500-800KB/sec from Sun related websites.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;rant&gt;<br />
Why is IPS so slow?  I&#8217;m trying to do image-update a fresh install of b131 to b134 which is about 784MB in 90054 files, I get between 20 and 100Kb/sec, so far it&#8217;s taken two hours to download 661MB and it&#8217;s not my bandwidth as I always get 500-800KB/sec from Sun related websites.   Of course the Sun site could be overloaded, or the webserver is bogged down 24/7/365 (I&#8217;ve never had an update go even remotely fast), so it must be down to the fact that it downloads individual files and not chunks or packages.   Once it&#8217;s finished it&#8217;ll of course have to install the files and do it&#8217;s &#8220;magic&#8221;, turning the whole update event into a half-day job.  I&#8217;m sorry, but that&#8217;s pathetic!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see the advantage of download individual files unless it&#8217;s capable…&#8230;</p>
<p>Please bring back SXCE until OpenSolaris is a bit more mature.<br />
&lt;/rant&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/03/opensolaris-ips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compiling Apache HTTP server on OpenSolaris</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/compiling-apache-http-server-on-opensolaris/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/compiling-apache-http-server-on-opensolaris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[configure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[httpd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This may not come as a surprise to many of you, especially the ones who have used OpenSolaris for a long time, but for myself who have only recently started tampering with the Indiana branch of OpenSolaris it took a few minutes to figure out what was going on.
When running Apache&#8217;s configure on OpenSolaris build [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may not come as a surprise to many of you, especially the ones who have used OpenSolaris for a long time, but for myself who have only recently started tampering with the Indiana branch of OpenSolaris it took a few minutes to figure out what was going on.</p>
<p>When running Apache&#8217;s configure on OpenSolaris build 131 it would bomb out at:</p>
<p><code>Configuring Apache Portable Runtime Utility library...<br />
checking for APR-util... yes<br />
  adding "-L/usr/lib" to LDFLAGS<br />
checking for gcc... gcc<br />
checking for C compiler default output file name...<br />
configure: error: in `/root/httpd-2.2.13':</code></p>
<p>Checking config.log showed me that it failed at <code>cc1: error: invalid option 't'</code>   Odd!<br />
It didn&#8217;t immediately occur to me that it was using the OpenSolaris supplied APR-util which is using the SunPro compiler.</p>
<p>So, the solution is to run configure with the <code>--with-included-apr</code> option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/02/compiling-apache-http-server-on-opensolaris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preliminary Text Install Images for b131</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/preliminary-text-install-images-for-b131/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/preliminary-text-install-images-for-b131/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caiman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[install]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sxce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday the OpenSolaris Install team released their first preliminary version of OpenSolaris which is capable of installing without a GUI, meaning entirely text based, this is great news and in due time now that SXCE is being pulled. It should now be much easier to install SPARC and xVM DomU&#8217;s, and what&#8217;s equally exciting is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday the OpenSolaris Install team released their first preliminary version of OpenSolaris which is capable of installing without a GUI, meaning entirely text based, this is great news and in due time now that SXCE is being pulled. It should now be much easier to install SPARC and xVM DomU&#8217;s, and what&#8217;s equally exciting is that it doesn&#8217;t install GNOME, this is ideal for servers where you don&#8217;t want all that GUI clutter.</p>
<blockquote><p>The install team has been working on a text-based installer for OpenSolaris.<br />
While this installer is not quite complete, given the timing of the SXCE to<br />
OpenSolaris transition, we are making available a preliminary version of the<br />
text installer, based on OpenSolaris build 131:</p>
<p>o supports SPARC/x86<br />
o 512 MB minimum memory requirement<br />
o cpio based install<br />
o installs basic headless server environment (no Gnome Desktop)<br />
o tip/serial line install recommended for SPARC</p>
<p>These are pre-integration bits from the project gate. Updates will be provided<br />
with each successive build of OpenSolaris until such time as a formal delivery<br />
is complete (after 2010.03) and RE assumes the building and distribution of images.</p>
<p>The CD images are located at:<br />
 SPARC:<br />
<a href="http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/text_install/131/textinstall-131-sparc.iso">http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/text_install/131/textinstall-131-sparc.iso</a><br />
   Size: 674 MB</p>
<p> x86:<br />
<a href="http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/text_install/131/textinstall-131-x86.iso">http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/text_install/131/textinstall-131-x86.iso</a><br />
   Size: 680 MB<br />
<a href="http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/text_install/131/textinstall-131-x86.usb">http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/text_install/131/textinstall-131-x86.usb</a><br />
   Size: 816 MB</p>
<p>MD5 sums are located at:<br />
  <a href="http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/text_install/131/md5sum.txt">http://dlc.sun.com/osol/install/downloads/text_install/131/md5sum.txt</a></p>
<p>Please read the release notes page at:<br />
   <a href="http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+caiman/Text+Install+b131+Notes">http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+caiman/Text+Install+b131+Notes</a><br />
for known limitations, a FAQ, and a link to open bugs.</p>
<p>Bugs can be filed on bugzilla at http://defect.opensolaris.org<br />
 Classification: Development<br />
 Product:        installer<br />
 Component:      textui</p>
<p>For more information on the text installer, see:</p>
<p>http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+caiman/TextInstallerProject</p>
<p>Please refer any questions to: caiman-discuss@opensolaris.org</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Sue</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/preliminary-text-install-images-for-b131/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick HOWTO: Sun DHCP daemon</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/quick-howto-sun-dhcp-daemon/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/quick-howto-sun-dhcp-daemon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhcp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhcpd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in.dhcpd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sun&#8217;s own DHCP daemon is not often used for anything besides Jumpstart/PXE boot and SunRay&#8217;s presumably because it&#8217;s not as well documented and accepted as the ISC DHCP daemon. I recently had a need to quickly setup a DHCP server and serve out a range of IP adresses including DNS servers and a default router, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sun&#8217;s own DHCP daemon is not often used for anything besides Jumpstart/PXE boot and SunRay&#8217;s presumably because it&#8217;s not as well documented and accepted as the <a href="http://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/">ISC DHCP</a> daemon. I recently had a need to quickly setup a DHCP server and serve out a range of IP adresses including DNS servers and a default router, all in all very basic. Here are my notes.</p>
<p>Setup DHCP in /var/dhcp using the SUNWfiles format<br />
<code># dhcpconfig -D -r SUNWfiles -p /var/dhcp</code></p>
<p>We only want to serve DHCP requests on bge1<br />
<code># /usr/sbin/dhcpconfig -P INTERFACES=bge1</code></p>
<p>Add new network<br />
<code># dhcpconfig -N 172.22.2.0 -m 255.255.255.0 -t 172.22.2.1</code></p>
<p>Display dhcptab table<br />
<code># dhtadm -P</code></p>
<p>Modify network/macro with various options<br />
<code># dhtadm -M -m 172.22.2.0 -d ':Subnet=255.255.255.0:Router=172.22.2.1:Broadcst=172.22.2.255:DNSserv=8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4:LeaseTim=86400:' -g</code></p>
<p>Add one client IP<br />
<code># pntadm -A 172.22.2.101 -c dhcp101 -m 172.22.2.0 172.22.2.0</code></p>
<p>Adding several client IPs<br />
<code># for IP in 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110<br />
do<br />
pntadm -A 172.22.2.${IP} -c dhcp${IP} -m 172.22.2.0 172.22.2.0<br />
done</code></p>
<p>Delete client IP<br />
<code># pntadm -D 172.22.2.107 172.22.2.0</code></p>
<p>Display DHCP network table<br />
<code># pntadm -P 172.22.2.0</code></p>
<p>Documentation: <a href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-3000/dhcptm-1?l=en&#038;a=view">Solaris System Administration Guide: IP Services &gt; DHCP</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/quick-howto-sun-dhcp-daemon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nevada: What&#8217;s going, what&#8217;s staying, what&#8217;s changing, what&#8217;s not</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/nevada-whats-going-whats-staying-whats-changing-whats-not/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/nevada-whats-going-whats-staying-whats-changing-whats-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jumpstart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sxce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allan Coopersmitch has posted a short explanation of what is going on now that SXCE (Solaris Express Community Edition) will no longer be available past january 2010.
There&#8217;s been some confusion over the upcoming changes as SXCE ends while
Nevada builds continue to be published to the IPS package repositories,
so this is an attempt to clear up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allan Coopersmitch has posted a short explanation of what is going on now that SXCE (Solaris Express Community Edition) will no longer be available past january 2010.</p>
<blockquote><p>There&#8217;s been some confusion over the upcoming changes as SXCE ends while<br />
Nevada builds continue to be published to the IPS package repositories,<br />
so this is an attempt to clear up some of that.   (Just in case it&#8217;s unclear,<br />
I am writing this is as an engineer trying to explain our work &#8211; I am not any<br />
sort of official spokesman, nor am I announcing any policy changes.)</p>
<p>What&#8217;s changing at build 131:</p>
<p>- The OS install images will only be available in IPS packaged formats.<br />
This means installs will be done via LiveCD (x86) or Automated<br />
Installer (SPARC or x86) &#8211; the old Install DVD, network install,<br />
jumpstart, and live upgrade all rely on the SXCE/SVR4 packaged<br />
images,    which will not be available after build 130.</p>
<p>Most consolidations provide the same packages via both mechanisms,<br />
though the IPS versions have some changes, such as merging the<br />
split / (root) and /usr filesystem packages into one combined package.</p>
<p>A number of packages that were already scheduled for removal from the<br />
next release of Solaris, or which are not redistributable due to third<br />
party license encumbrances, are not included in the IPS repositories.</p>
<p>For instance, for X, we&#8217;ve not packaged Xsun or the legacy SPARC graphics<br />
drivers in IPS format, so once this changeover is done, SPARC<br />
platforms will only have Xorg, and only have the graphics drivers for<br />
astfb (AST2000, 2100), efb (XVR-50, 100, 300), and kfb (XVR-2500).</p>
<p>CDE has similarly only had IPS conversions done of the packages for<br />
the non-EOF portions (Motif, Tooltalk, dtksh, etc.) and most of the<br />
CDE desktop applications &amp; environment will go away in the transition.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s not changing at build 131:</p>
<p>- Build schedules &#8211; still every two weeks (except at holidays), still<br />
following the same Nevada build schedule and build sequence &#8211; the<br />
builds continue to be numbered &#8220;snv_131&#8243;, &#8220;snv_132&#8243;, etc.</p>
<p>See http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+on/schedule<br />
for the ongoing schedules for when the code freezes occur and the<br />
packages are delivered to the release engineers who build the ISO<br />
images and IPS repositories.   As before, these are *build* schedules,<br />
not release schedules, and release of the built product remains about<br />
two weeks behind the build date shown.</p>
<p>- Bug tracking &#8211; the release is still &#8220;solaris_nevada&#8221;, and the builds<br />
have the same names as before.   Developers won&#8217;t start ignoring<br />
all &#8220;nevada&#8221; bugs, but once the changeover happens bugs that only<br />
affect the SVR4 install methods (live upgrade, pkghistory, postinstall<br />
scripts, etc.) may be either marked with the &#8220;no-snv+&#8221; keyword<br />
to indicate they are not Nevada bugs if they affect prior releases<br />
of Solaris, or closed as will-not-fix if they only applied to the<br />
Nevada versions.</p>
<p>Bugs for most of the OS should still be filed into Sun&#8217;s bugster<br />
database via the http://bugs.opensolaris.org/ website, though<br />
IPS, OpenSolaris Installation, and Desktop bugs should continue to<br />
be filed in the bugzilla database at http://defect.opensolaris.org/</p>
<p>- Code repositories &#8211; the Nevada gates/repositories for all the<br />
consolidations will still be used &#8211; onnv for ON, XW_NV for X,<br />
sfwnv for SFW, etc.</p>
<p>- The packages created by building the code &#8211; for the next few builds,<br />
all consolidations will continue to generate SVR4 packages for their<br />
builds, and the IPS team will continue to convert them to IPS, just<br />
as they have been since the IPS builds started for the first<br />
OpenSolaris release.</p>
<p>ON will be changing generate IPS packages first, after the 2010.03<br />
release of OpenSolaris, as noted in:</p>
<p>http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/on-discuss/2010-January/001461.html</p>
<p>The rest of the consolidations will change in later builds, once<br />
we see what issues ON hits, and the necessary infrastructure is<br />
in place for delivering IPS packages from consolidations to the<br />
central Release Engineering repository.  X, Desktop, &amp; SFW are next<br />
in line after ON, and have been working with Liane &amp; the ON/IPS team<br />
on planning for our changeovers.</p>
<p>I hope this helps with confusion people have had &#8211; if not, try asking<br />
your questions on the appropriate OpenSolaris.Org mailing list or web<br />
forum.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/nevada-whats-going-whats-staying-whats-changing-whats-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The death of NIS+</title>
		<link>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/the-death-of-nis/</link>
		<comments>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/the-death-of-nis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lasseoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nis plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nis+]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unixzone.dk/unix/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of OpenSolaris build 130 NIS+ is officially no longer available, refer http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6874309
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of OpenSolaris build 130 NIS+ is officially no longer available, refer <a href="http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6874309">http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6874309</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unixzone.dk/unix/2010/01/the-death-of-nis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
